Comments made by jbearsea

What is going at Kink? Seriously? Encoding issues and not receiving a full shoot two weeks ago, the Great Panda Debacle of 2012, last week, and no shoot yet this week because of encoding issues? Really?

I find it interesting, that for the most part, the members on here who are attacking other members are those defending Donna. Most of the member's who were critical of this shoot were being honest about their frustration with this shoot, frustration with this site, or lack of a positive response from Donna or someone else form Kink. In general, they did not attack the members who had positive things to say. I myself am very frustrated with this whole affair, but in particular with Donna's lack of response to those customers who did express their concerns. It has become very clear to me, that not just Donna, but many of the producers at Kink no longer listen to customers, and would rather take us for granted along with our money. I have been a member almost since the beginning and can remember when their was respectful discourse in these postings and Kink really cared about it's members, even if it disagreed. Maybe it's too big of a site now to do that anymore. For those of you enjoy the sites, I hope you continue your support. For Kink, it's producers, models, and others I wish you well. I know producing this type of material is not easy, but at this point with the way I have been treated as a paying customer I just cancelled all nine of my subscriptions. I'll keep an eye out and see if you are able to return to producing material I personally enjoy and if you are able to rectify your customer service issues. If so, then I'll be happy to support you again in the future. All the best.

torretxt - I could not disagree with you more about how Princess Donna has been running this site of late. I respect the difficulty in producing a site such as this and always try to assume good intent, but her scene description above along with her responses have shown a total lack of accountability and respect for the customers on this site. We have been made to feel that we should just throw her our membership dollars to do with as she pleases. If that's the kind of site she wants to run, then open that type of site. This site has specifcally been marketed as a multiple male on bound female gangbang site. We have had many scenes that have included absolutley no bondage whatsoever, and many others with very little. I am not downplaying how difficult it is to recruit good actors/models to participate in what can not be a very easy to film situation. However, that is what is promoted in the title and marketing of this site. While I don't know her at all, and while I would still like to assume good intent on her part, Princess Donna has failed miserabley to hold herself accountable for this situation and address the upset customers. I feel like the vast majority of us who have posted critical comments about this scene or on the site in general are just being told to go screw ourselves (and not in a good way). However, I'm still holding out hope that I am wrong and the she will post an appropriate response to the members and make it up somehow (either wiht an extra shoot or a refund). As a very long term multi-site Kink subscriber I am hurt to be taken advantage of this way and see the members concenrs dismissed.

Thanks Van - I have been posting the comment because you used to be very receptive and open to your customers requests and comments. It would be great if you could let me know if you plan to use some non-boy subs in the near future or if this is a 'boy' sub only site now. I fully respect your decision either way, but if it is the latter then I would like to know so I can unsubscribe to this particular site. I'll keep BG and MOE as you do use models I like there. Just not sure if you're going through a phase on this site or if it's a permanent change. Thanks for listening.

appleofmypie11 they can have all the fun they want on their own time and dime. the customers pay for this site. It's like paying an airline to take you to San Francisco and you end up in Ohmaha instead.

Van - not sure why my comment was deleated.I did follow the posting guidelines. All I have been saying is that I would prefer to have a sub model like you used to that is a little older, with some hair, maybe a little muscle and some experience like Jason Miller or Ned. You have been using 'boys' (your term, it's in your scene description) are not personally my thing. Great for those who like this, but I would like to see you return to some of the more traditional type of subs you've used in the past, at lease for some of the shoots. We have quite a few 'boy' subs for a while now.

Can we please have some scenes where a man is being dominated rather than a twink. Nothing against twinks, and I know this type of site is going to have them as the subs quite often, but it would be really nice to see someone with some meat on his bones and hair on his chest and a little experience behind him in the submissive role again. If not someone new, then a classic like Jason Miller or Ned). I'd much rather see a MAN be used and dominated than a boy any day and it's been quite a while since you've done this. I appreciate all the hard work and talent that goes ito this site, but my two cents worth is: More MEN, less boys! Thanks for considering.