naked kombat presents Jeremy stevens vs marcus ruhl muscled oil match
KINK LIVE SCHEDULE (Kink Time: )
Wed May 29th
1pm
5yr Anniversary Live Show
on Bound Gods
Welcome to a very special Bound Gods Live show. Yes, BG is 5 years old! This 4-hour live BDSM event will star Jeremy Stevens as the dom, John Jammen as the co-dom, Sebastian Keys, Chad Rock, Holden Phillips, Lief Kaase, Randall O'Reilly as the subs, and Van Darkholme as the dom and rigger. There may be a special guest as well. Please join us in the debauchery and celebration. This show will be free for Bound Gods members and pay-per-minute for non-members. Watch Jeremy and Van take these experienced slutty slaves to their limits.
Bound In Public.com

Comments made by jbearsea

Date Comment Vote Site
Jul 11, 2012

My understanding is this forum exists to express comments, both positive and critical. For me personally my concerns about Kink and BGB is not just this particular scene. It is a general degradation of content, quality of production, and general customer service. This scene for me, was just what kind of pushed me over the edge as a paying customer to say "I'm done for now". In the past, the producers on Kink have been very responsive to both positive and negative feedback. That has changed recently, but it could always change again. In which case, I may consider returning. Who knows, my subscriptions are not quite up yet and if Kink returns to a level that I feel is in line with the subscription fees, I may stay. Yes, I get this is just porno. But we pay good money for this porno with a reasonable expectation that we will receive what was advertised. When I decide to leave a business, which Kink is, that I have used for many years, then I think it's fair to let them know why rather than just walk away. Especially if they have been gracious enough to provide a forum to do so. By the way, those of you complaining about this being no big deal, just porn, might want to think about those on the other side of the camera who are making their living off of porn. What disturbs me more than anything about this particular experience with the comments on the Panda scene, is the pathetic need those who enjoyed the scene feel to attack those of who did not. I don't really see any of the people who posted critical responses, going "hey idiot how in the world could you think this was any good?" If you loved the scene, post a "great" comment about it. If you hated the scene, post a "poor" comment about it. However, if you are so twisted and messed up that the only way you can feel better about yourself is to attack people who posted critical comments about a product they paid for and were unhappy with, then you have much more serious issues to resolve in your life. My comments are not meant to attack Donna, the models, or anyone else who works at Kink on a personal level. Donna and everyone else may be incredible people. And while I do understand that this is not an easy product to produce well on a regular basis, my comments are intended to be critical of how Kink is currently performing as a business entity. I hope people are able to distinguish between the two. All the best to everyone.

Poor

Bound Gang Bangs
Jul 11, 2012

What is going at Kink? Seriously? Encoding issues and not receiving a full shoot two weeks ago, the Great Panda Debacle of 2012, last week, and no shoot yet this week because of encoding issues? Really?

Poor

Bound Gang Bangs
Jul 10, 2012

Terrific scene. Colby is super. A nice meaty masculine guy with some hair.Since he plays rugby, would have been nice to have him in rugby gear instead of football gear, but still hot either way. Doesn't sound like he would be up for it up, but he's exactly the kind of guy I would like to see subbing (or topping for that matter) on BIP.

Great!

Men On Edge
Jul 7, 2012

I find it interesting, that for the most part, the members on here who are attacking other members are those defending Donna. Most of the member's who were critical of this shoot were being honest about their frustration with this shoot, frustration with this site, or lack of a positive response from Donna or someone else form Kink. In general, they did not attack the members who had positive things to say. I myself am very frustrated with this whole affair, but in particular with Donna's lack of response to those customers who did express their concerns. It has become very clear to me, that not just Donna, but many of the producers at Kink no longer listen to customers, and would rather take us for granted along with our money. I have been a member almost since the beginning and can remember when their was respectful discourse in these postings and Kink really cared about it's members, even if it disagreed. Maybe it's too big of a site now to do that anymore. For those of you enjoy the sites, I hope you continue your support. For Kink, it's producers, models, and others I wish you well. I know producing this type of material is not easy, but at this point with the way I have been treated as a paying customer I just cancelled all nine of my subscriptions. I'll keep an eye out and see if you are able to return to producing material I personally enjoy and if you are able to rectify your customer service issues. If so, then I'll be happy to support you again in the future. All the best.

Poor

Bound Gang Bangs
Jul 5, 2012

sorry for the poor spelling, been a very long day.

Poor

Bound Gang Bangs
Jul 5, 2012

torretxt - I could not disagree with you more about how Princess Donna has been running this site of late. I respect the difficulty in producing a site such as this and always try to assume good intent, but her scene description above along with her responses have shown a total lack of accountability and respect for the customers on this site. We have been made to feel that we should just throw her our membership dollars to do with as she pleases. If that's the kind of site she wants to run, then open that type of site. This site has specifcally been marketed as a multiple male on bound female gangbang site. We have had many scenes that have included absolutley no bondage whatsoever, and many others with very little. I am not downplaying how difficult it is to recruit good actors/models to participate in what can not be a very easy to film situation. However, that is what is promoted in the title and marketing of this site. While I don't know her at all, and while I would still like to assume good intent on her part, Princess Donna has failed miserabley to hold herself accountable for this situation and address the upset customers. I feel like the vast majority of us who have posted critical comments about this scene or on the site in general are just being told to go screw ourselves (and not in a good way). However, I'm still holding out hope that I am wrong and the she will post an appropriate response to the members and make it up somehow (either wiht an extra shoot or a refund). As a very long term multi-site Kink subscriber I am hurt to be taken advantage of this way and see the members concenrs dismissed.

Poor

Bound Gang Bangs
Jul 4, 2012

Donna - I appreciate that you want to try new things and experiment, but that's not how this site is marketed. We pay for a product and look forward to that produce each week. If you want to mess around and produce experimental scenes then either add a new Kink site marketed towards that.. or put them on as bonus shoots that we don't have to pay for. It seems to me from your video description you knew your were posting a scene that most of your paying customers would not appreciate or like. I'm all for experimentation at the right time and place, but I expect to receive what I pay for, and we simply didn't this week and you don't seem to really care.

Poor

Bound Gang Bangs
Jul 4, 2012

Thanks Van - I have been posting the comment because you used to be very receptive and open to your customers requests and comments. It would be great if you could let me know if you plan to use some non-boy subs in the near future or if this is a 'boy' sub only site now. I fully respect your decision either way, but if it is the latter then I would like to know so I can unsubscribe to this particular site. I'll keep BG and MOE as you do use models I like there. Just not sure if you're going through a phase on this site or if it's a permanent change. Thanks for listening.

Great!

Bound in Public
Jul 4, 2012

shows a complete lack of respect for your fans and paying customers. If you this was really a fantasy you wanted to post and share, then you should have done it as a Bonus video, not as a regular shoot.

Poor

Bound Gang Bangs
Jul 4, 2012

appleofmypie11 they can have all the fun they want on their own time and dime. the customers pay for this site. It's like paying an airline to take you to San Francisco and you end up in Ohmaha instead.

Great!

Bound Gang Bangs
Jul 4, 2012

Horrible, if you want to run a furry site, then open one. Waste of our time and money!

Poor

Bound Gang Bangs
Jul 1, 2012

Van - not sure why my comment was deleated.I did follow the posting guidelines. All I have been saying is that I would prefer to have a sub model like you used to that is a little older, with some hair, maybe a little muscle and some experience like Jason Miller or Ned. You have been using 'boys' (your term, it's in your scene description) are not personally my thing. Great for those who like this, but I would like to see you return to some of the more traditional type of subs you've used in the past, at lease for some of the shoots. We have quite a few 'boy' subs for a while now.

Poor

Bound in Public
Jun 22, 2012

I agree that his was a fairly boring scene, nothing new or exciting. I've been a big fan of Mark's for as long as I can remember, but PD might benefit from some new blood for a while. Rather than the same guys that have been on here for almost since he beginning, or cycling through another overexposed (no pun intended) mainstream male porn star, you might find that some new talent would infuse some energy and excitment back into this site. The once exception I might make, is it would be great to see Maestro back at it again. Just a thought.

Poor

Public Disgrace
Jun 22, 2012

Can we please have some scenes where a man is being dominated rather than a twink. Nothing against twinks, and I know this type of site is going to have them as the subs quite often, but it would be really nice to see someone with some meat on his bones and hair on his chest and a little experience behind him in the submissive role again. If not someone new, then a classic like Jason Miller or Ned). I'd much rather see a MAN be used and dominated than a boy any day and it's been quite a while since you've done this. I appreciate all the hard work and talent that goes ito this site, but my two cents worth is: More MEN, less boys! Thanks for considering.

Poor

Bound in Public
Jun 2, 2012

Less twinks, more men please. Cory seems like a nice guy. I just prefer when you use men on this site.

Poor

Bound in Public